Applied nutritional investigationBody composition interpretation: Contributions of the fat-free mass index and the body fat mass index☆
Introduction
Malnutrition and obesity have been shown to increase morbidity and mortality.1, 2 Epidemiologic studies have also shown that low and high body mass index (BMI) values increase morbidity and mortality.3, 4 Research also has indicated that body composition, more than BMI, is a primary determinant of health5 and a better predictor of mortality risk than BMI.6
Over half of the adults in the United States7 are overweight, and an increasing number of Europeans are becoming overweight. Obesity is normally defined by BMI. BMI values between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2 are considered normal; individuals with BMI values from 25 to 29.9 kg/m2 are considered overweight and those with values greater than 30 kg/m2 are considered obese.8 Underweight subjects (BMI < 18.5) are also at nutritional risk.9 Thus, prevention of weight gain and low body mass are a public health priority.
Recent studies also have shown that weight and BMI alone are not adequate measurements of underlying changes in fat-free mass (FFM) and body fat mass (BF) during menopause,10 aging,11 and illness in general.12, 13
Little is known about what constitutes “normal” FFM and BF. “Healthy” body fat percentages (%BF) have been suggested to be in the ranges of 12 to 20 for men and 20 to 30 for women.14 Even though individuals with %BF above these cutoff values have an increased likelihood of being functionally obese, not everyone will be. Higher %BF values have been reported in apparently healthy populations.15, 16 We also found that hospitalized patients are more likely to have low FFM and low or excess BF,12, 17 suggesting increased health risks in patients.
Until now, it has been customary to use absolute FFM (kg) and %BF to evaluate nutrition status.18 Because FFM and BF change with height, weight, and age, it is difficult to determine whether individual subjects have low or high FFM or BF. The use of FFM in absolute terms complicates interpretation because FFM is closely related to height and decreases with age. The use of percentage of FFM does not adequately reflect nutrition status because FFM automatically decreases in proportion to %BF increases. The colinearity between the two parameters limits the interpretation of absolute FFM and relative changes of FFM. Variations of FFM and BF with age and height also make it difficult to establish desirable ranges.
Just as BMI is useful in evaluating the excess or deficit in body weight of individuals of different heights, the fat-free mass index (FFMI; kg/m2) and body fat mass index (BFMI; kg/m2) are potentially useful in evaluating body composition parameters by effectively eliminating differences in FFM and BF associated with height.19 Height-independent body composition parameters (FFMI and BFMI) allow height-independent interpretation of nutrition status, comparisons of results between studies, and the development of body composition percentile tables.
The use of FFMI and BFMI allows the tracking of the effects of illness, treatment, or aging in individuals and in groups because they can be interpreted as absolute values or by classifying individuals or groups of individuals as normal or abnormal (low and high). FFMI also permits one to determine whether lower FFM with age is due to shorter height in older subjects or to changes in body composition. FFMI and BFMI also identify individuals with excess muscle mass but without excess BF. These changes are of interest at the group or population level.
The purpose of this population study was to determine FFMI, BFMI, and %BF ranges in subjects with low, normal, overweight, and obese BMI. Our study presents FFMI and BFMI in 5629 healthy men and women across the age span, from 15 to 98 y. The ranges of FFMI and BFMI for a given BMI category can be used to evaluate whether FFM is low and BF is low or high in adults.
Section snippets
Subjects
Healthy adults (2982 men and 2647 women), age 18 to 98 y, were non-randomly recruited through advertisements in local newspapers with an offer of free bioelectrical impedance analyses (BIAs), at exhibitions at trade fairs and fun runs, among public administration staffs, and by invitations sent to leisure clubs for the elderly. The anthropometric and BIA data and the number of healthy subjects are shown in Table I. All subjects were ambulatory whites (Western European) without known pathologies
Results
Table I shows the anthropometric and body composition measurements of healthy men and women between 18 and 98 y. Height was highest in the youngest men and women and progressively decreased thereafter. Weight was progressively greater in older than in younger subjects. BMI (Table I) was progressively greater in older than in younger men and women.
Discussion
BMI does not separate body compartments into FFM and BF. Because research has indicated that body composition is a primary determinant of health,5 FFM and BF compartments should be determined as part of a health assessment. FFM and BF change with height, weight, and age. It is therefore difficult to determine whether individual subjects have low or high FFM or BF. FFMI and BFMI eliminate differences in FFM and BF due to height and offer the advantage of having one set of recommended ranges,
Conclusion
BMI alone cannot provide information about the respective contributions of FFM and FM to body weight. This study presented the FFMI, BFMI, and %BF values that correspond to low, normal, overweight, and obese BMIs. FFMI and BFMI can provide meaningful information about body compartments, regardless of height.
References (39)
- et al.
Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery
Am J Surg
(1980) - et al.
A prospective evaluation of general medical patients during the course of hospitalisation
Am J Clin Nutr
(1979) - et al.
Height-normalized indices of the body’s fat-free mass and fat masspotentially useful indicators of nutritional status
Am J Clin Nutr
(1990) - et al.
Aging, body composition, and lifestylethe Fels Longitudinal Study
Am J Clin Nutr
(1999) - et al.
Nutrition status in <60 and >60 yr old patients at hospital admissiona controlled population study in 995 subjects
Nutrition
(2002) - et al.
Healthy body weightsan alternative perspective
Am J Clin Nutr
(1996) - et al.
Fat-free and fat mass percentiles in 5225 healthy subjects aged 15 to 98 years
Nutrition
(2001) - et al.
Why bioelectrical impedance analysis should be used for estimating adiposity
Am J Clin Nutr
(1996) - et al.
Single prediction equation for bioelectrical impedance analysis in adults aged 20–94 yrs
Nutrition
(2001) - et al.
Assessment of fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance measurements of the human body
Am J Clin Nutr
(1985)
Healthy percentage body fat rangesan approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index
Am J Clin Nutr
Tissue depletion and health related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Respir Med
Different patterns of chronic tissue wasting among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Clin Nutr
Skeletal muscle weakness is associated with wasting of extremity fat-free mass but not with airflow obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Am J Clin Nutr
Longitudinal changes in adult fat-free massinfluence of body weight
Am J Clin Nutr
Cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men
Am J Clin Nutr
Body mass index and all-cause mortality among people age 70 and overthe Longitudinal Study of Aging
Int J Obes
Mortality associated with body fat, fat-free mass and body mass index among 60-year-old Swedish men-a 22-year follow-up. The study of men born in 1913
Int J Obes Rel Metab Disord
Body composition, not body weight, is related to cardiovascular disease risk factors and sex hormone levels in men
J Clin Invest
Cited by (335)
Muscle mass evaluation in hospitalized patients: Comparison between doubly indirect methods
2024, Clinical Nutrition ESPENBody composition and cancer survival: a narrative review
2024, British Journal of Cancer
- ☆
We thank the Foundation Nutrition 2000Plus for its financial support.