Elsevier

Nutrition

Volume 33, January 2017, Pages 204-210
Nutrition

Applied nutritional investigation
Randomized study of the clinical effects of ω-3 fatty acid–containing enteral nutrition support during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on chemotherapy-related toxicity in patients with esophageal cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2016.07.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Little is known about the effect of ω-3 fatty acids on reducing chemotherapy-related toxicities.

  • A randomized study was conducted to compare ω-3–rich enteral nutrition (EN) with ω-3–poor EN in patients undergoing cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

  • ω-3–rich EN reduced the incidence of chemotherapy-related mucosal toxicities and had a hepatoprotective effect during chemotherapy.

Abstract

Objectives

Omega-3 (ω-3) fatty acids have potential positive effects during chemotherapy, such as body weight maintenance and muscle mass preservation. However, little is known about the effect this supplement might have on reducing chemotherapy-induced toxicities. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of ω-3 fatty acid supplementation in the reduction of chemotherapy-related toxicities.

Methods

Sixty-one patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer randomly received ω-3–rich enteral nutrition (EN; n = 31) or ω-3–poor EN support (n = 30) for 15 d during chemotherapy. The daily dosage of ω-3 fatty acids was 900 mg in the ω-3–rich group and 250 mg in the ω-3–poor group. The primary endpoint was the frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia, and secondary endpoints included other chemotherapy-related adverse events, body weight, and inflammatory markers.

Results

The total and dietary intake calories during chemotherapy were equal in both groups. There was no significant difference in the body weight change after chemotherapy between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 leukopenia and neutropenia (P > 0.05). However, stomatitis was significantly less frequent in the ω-3–rich group, than in the ω-3–poor group (P = 0.018). Grade 3/4 diarrhea occurred relatively less frequently in the ω-3–rich group than in the ω-3–poor group; however, this difference was not significant (16.1% versus 36.7%, respectively, P = 0.068). Increases in the aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels were seen significantly less frequently in the ω-3–rich group than in the ω-3–poor group (P = 0.012 and P = 0.015, respectively).

Conclusions

ω-3–rich EN support decreased the frequency of chemotherapy-induced mucosal toxicities, such as stomatitis and diarrhea, and exhibited a hepatoprotective effect during chemotherapy, compared with the ω-3–poor EN support.

Introduction

Chemotherapy-related toxicity is a major obstacle to the successful treatment of advanced cancers. The most common chemotherapy-related toxicities include leukopenia, anemia, general fatigue, stomatitis, and appetite loss. These toxicities not only reduce patient quality of life, but may sometimes lead to the discontinuation of treatment and the dose reduction of anticancer drugs, which in turn may attenuate the effectiveness of chemotherapy [1], [2]. Any approach aimed at reducing chemotherapy-induced toxicities is needed to maximize the efficacy of treatment.

A randomized study was previously completed that compared the effects of enteral nutrition (EN) support with parenteral nutrition (PN) support on chemotherapy-induced toxicities in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy [3]. The finding demonstrated that EN support markedly decreased the frequency of grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) including leukopenia and neutropenia. However, the mechanism by which EN support decreased the incidence of hematologic AEs could not be fully explained. One potential explanation is that ω-3 fatty acids, which were abundantly present in the nutritional supplement used in the previous study, may have had a positive effect on decreasing the frequency of grade 3/4 hematologic AEs. ω-3 fatty acid supplementation in patients undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both may help maintain body weight and preserve body composition [4], [5], [6]. However, little is known regarding the effect of ω-3 fatty acids in patients undergoing chemotherapy, especially with regard to the reduction of chemotherapy-induced toxicities. Thus, additional clinical trials were required to determine the effect of ω-3 fatty acids on chemotherapy-related toxicities.

The present clinical trial was designed to determine the usefulness of ω-3 fatty acid supplementation in the reduction of chemotherapy-related toxicities. We conducted a prospective, randomized study that compared EN containing abundant amounts of ω-3 fatty acids with EN containing a scarce amount of ω-3 fatty acids in patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Section snippets

Patients

This prospective randomized study enrolled 61 patients with esophageal cancer. The eligibility criteria for the study were as follows:

  • Histopathologically proven thoracic esophageal cancer that was previously untreated;

  • Stage I, II, III, or IV due to distant node involvement only;

  • Ages 20 to 80 y;

  • An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2;

  • Sufficient major organ function: white blood count >3000/mm3, hemoglobin >9 g/dL, platelet count >100 000/mm3, aspartate aminotransferase

Patient characteristics

Sixty-one patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and who provided informed consent were enrolled in this study. Thirty-one patients were randomly assigned to the ω-3–rich group, and 30 patients to the ω-3–poor group (Fig. 2). All 31 patients in the ω-3–rich group completed the EN supplementation during the first cycle of chemotherapy. Four patients discontinued the EN supplementation before the second cycle: Two refused to take the EN supplementation as a result

Discussion

The present study compared the effects of ω-3 fatty acid–rich EN support with ω-3 fatty acid–poor EN support on chemotherapy-induced AEs in patients undergoing cisplatin-based chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia, which was the primary endpoint of this study, between the two groups. However, the results demonstrated that the ω-3 fatty acid–rich EN support decreased the frequency of chemotherapy-induced mucosal

Conclusions

The present study did not demonstrate that ω-3 fatty acid–rich EN support decreased the frequency of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia any more than ω-3 fatty acid–poor EN support. However, the study did find that ω-3 fatty acid–rich EN support decreased the frequency of chemotherapy-induced mucosal toxicities, such as stomatitis and diarrhea, and provided hepatoprotection compared with ω-3 fatty acid–poor EN support. Additional clinical trials are needed to determine the most appropriate dose

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge all of the investigators, coordinators, and patients who took part in this study.

References (27)

  • M. Foote

    The importance of planned dose of chemotherapy on time: do we need to change our clinical practice?

    Oncologist

    (1998)
  • R.A. Murphy et al.

    Nutritional intervention with fish oil provides a benefit over standard of care for weight and skeletal muscle mass in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy

    Cancer

    (2011)
  • L. Sobin et al.

    TNM classification of malignant tumours

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text