Elsevier

Nutrition

Volume 27, Issue 10, Supplement, October 2011, Pages S1-S20
Nutrition

Special article
26th Hohenheim Consensus Conference, September 11, 2010 Scientific substantiation of health claims: Evidence-based nutrition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2011.04.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

The objective was to define the term evidence based nutrition on the basis of expert discussions and scientific evidence.

Methods and procedures

The method used is the established Hohenheim Consensus Conference. The term “Hohenheim Consensus Conference” defines conferences dealing with nutrition-related topics. The major aim of the conference is to review the state of the art of a given topic with experts from different areas (basic science, clinicians, epidemiologists, etc.). Based on eight to 12 questions, the experts discuss short answers and try to come to a consensus. A scientifically based text is formulated that justifies the consensus answer. To discuss the requirements for the scientific substantiation of claims, the 26th Hohenheim Consensus Conference gathered the views of many academic experts in the field of nutritional research and asked these experts to address the various aspects of a claims substantiation process and the possibilities and limitations of the different approaches.

Results

The experts spent a day presenting and discussing their views and arrived at several consensus statements that can serve as guidance for bodies performing claims assessments in the framework of regulatory systems.

Conclusion

The 26th Hohenheim Consensus Conference addresses some general aspects and describes the current scientific status from the point of view of six case studies to illustrate specific areas of scientific interest: carotenoids and vitamin A in relation to age-related macular degeneration, the quality of carbohydrates (as expressed by the glycemic index) in relation to health and well-being, probiotics in relation to intestinal and immune functions, micronutrient intake and maintenance of normal body functions, and food components with antioxidative properties and health benefits.

Introduction

An important objective of global regulatory legislation is to ensure that health claims on foods and food constituents can be properly justified and scientifically substantiated. Consumers should be able to make choices based on clear and accurate information and have confidence in the scientific and regulatory processes used to support health claims. Any framework must not only protect consumers from false and misleading claims but also satisfy the needs of industry to promote and innovate, to stimulate multidisciplinary research, and to reinvigorate efforts to process and preserve raw materials from agriculture, horticulture, fisheries, and aquaculture into a diverse range of foods and food supplements.

Global regulatory frameworks currently reflect the role of food and food constituents in maintaining and promoting human health and in decreasing the risk of disease. The purpose of this consensus conference was to consider recent developments and initiatives on the scientific substantiation of health claims and to pay particular attention to the following items.

  • The assessment of the totality of the available data and the need for the development of a scientific framework for weighing the strength, consistency, biological plausibility, and coherence of the evidence.

  • A critical examination of the application of the model for evidence-based medicine in nutrition science; evidence-based medicine is designed to evaluate the effects of drugs and not the unique properties, complex effects, and interactions of nutrients and bioactive substances.

  • The need to address and define evidence-based nutrition, to embrace state-of-the-art nutrition science, and to stimulate future academic research.

  • The identification and validation of relevant biomarkers that can predict potential benefits relating to maintenance or improvement of a function and those associated with decreased risk of disease.

  • The determination of the strength of recommendations to reflect the available evidence and consensus among experts in a particular field to communicate truthful nutritional and health messages to the public.

The final decision on whether or not a claim should be allowed rests with the regulators and policy managers, taking into account the scientific assessments of the strength and coherence of the evidence and other societal and health policy considerations including the broader purposes of food labeling and claims to help and improve the public understanding of nutrition and to support strategies for public health promotion and improvement.

To discuss the requirements for the scientific substantiation of claims, the 26th Hohenheim Consensus Conference gathered the views of many academic experts in the field of nutritional research and asked these experts to address the various aspects of a claims substantiation process and the possibilities and limitations of the different approaches. The experts spent a day presenting and discussing their views and arrived at some consensus statements that can serve as guidance for bodies performing claims assessments in the framework of regulatory systems. This report addresses several general aspects and describes the current scientific status from the point of view of five case studies to illustrate specific relevant perspectives:

  • Carotenoids and Vitamin A in relation to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

  • The quality of carbohydrates (as expressed by the glycemic index [GI]) in relation to health and well-being.

  • Probiotics in relation to intestinal and immune functions.

  • Micronutrient intake and maintenance of normal body functions.

  • Food components with antioxidative properties and health benefits.

Section snippets

Assessing the totality of the available evidence for diet–health relations

This section discusses methodologies for assessing the validity of diet–health relations, with a particular focus on how to consider the totality of the available data, weigh the evidence, and address the strength, consistency, and biological plausibility of a particular diet and health relation. It also deals with requirements and processes to develop research methodologies to demonstrate beneficial effects in a healthy population.

Case studies

In this section several case studies were discussed to address under what conditions the totality of the current scientific data and supportive evidence from generally accepted sources and recognized scientific institutions could find more suitable alternatives to RCTs.

These case studies address the following diet–health relations:

  • Carotenoids and vitamin A in relation to AMD.

  • The quality of carbohydrates (as expressed by the GI) in relation to health and well-being.

  • Probiotics in relation to

Role of various types of scientific data: clinical trials, meta-analysis, and observational and traditional evidence

One particular field of discussion is the value of the various sources of scientific data in support of a diet–health relation. This includes the advantages and limitations of sources including RCTs, meta-analysis, observational evidence, and traditional use in the process of assessing the evidence for diet–health relations. This section addresses these aspects of the claims assessment process.

The future of nutritional research

This session addresses whether claims relating to the maintenance of health would need to be assessed in a different way than claims that relate to the decrease of the development of a disease and what is the role of generally accepted scientific evidence in this respect.

Conclusion

All types and sources of data need to be considered in the weighing of the totality of the evidence, and the best and most logical resource to assess the evidence available in support of the biological plausibility and probability of the beneficial role of a nutrient or food component is by gathering the experts in the field and reaching conclusions in the form of a scientific consensus. This assures that the totality of the evidence is considered and that conclusions are reached in the best

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the European Responsible Nutrition Alliance for their financial support of this conference and publishing the report. The authors thank Jana Tinz for her assistance in publishing the report as supplement coordinator. They also thank Dr. Claudia Wicke for the organization of the consensus conference.

References (79)

  • A. Hartwig

    Role of magnesium in genomic stability

    Mutat Res

    (2001)
  • H. Nakatsuji et al.

    Dysregulation of glucose, insulin, triglyceride, blood pressure, and oxidative stress after an oral glucose tolerance test in men with abdominal obesity

    Metabolism

    (2010)
  • A.T. Diplock et al.

    Scientific concepts of functional foods in Europe. Consensus document

    Br J Nutr

    (1999)
  • D.P. Richardson et al.

    PASSCLAIM—synthesis and review of existing processes

    Eur J Nutr

    (2003)
  • A.B. Hill

    The environment and disease: association or causation?

    Proc R Soc Med

    (1965)
  • P.J. Aggett et al.

    PASSCLAIM: consensus on criteria

    Eur J Nutr

    (2005)
  • Identifying the environmental causes of disease: how should we decide what to believe and when to take action? Report synopsis

    (2007)
  • J. Blumberg et al.

    Evidence-based criteria in the nutritional context

    Nutr Rev

    (2010)
  • J. Howick et al.

    The evolution of evidence hierarchies: what can Bradford Hill’s ‘guidelines for causation’ contribute?

    J R Soc Med

    (2009)
  • J. Howick et al.

    Evidence-based mechanistic reasoning

    J R Soc Med

    (2010)
  • A.C. Ward

    The role of causal criteria in causal inferences: Bradford Hill’s “aspects of association.”

    Epidemiol Perspect Innov

    (2009)
  • C.V. Phillips et al.

    The missed lessons of Sir Austin Bradford Hill

    Epidemiol Perspect Innov

    (2004)
  • J.A. Maxwell

    Using qualitative methods for causal explanation

    Field Methods

    (2004)
  • Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: report of a joint FAG/WHO expert consultation. WHO technical report series 916

    (2004)
  • Food, nutrition and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective

    (1997)
  • The Netherlands Ministry of Health. Netherlands proposal for a systematic approach for a generic list of health claims....
  • EMEA Working Party on Herbal Medicinal Products. Final concept paper on the implementation of different levels of...
  • M. Höfler

    The Bradford Hill considerations on causality: a counterfactual perspective

    Emerg Themes Epidemiol

    (2005)
  • World Health Organization. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the...
  • A. Gallagher et al.

    A standardised approach towards PROving the efficacy of foods and food constituents for health CLAIMs (PROCLAIM): providing guidance

    Br J Nutr

    (2011)
  • What is health? The ability to adapt

    Lancet

    (2009)
  • B. van Ommen et al.

    A network biology model of micronutrient related health

    Br J Nutr

    (2008)
  • B. van Ommen et al.

    Challenging homeostasis to define biomarkers for nutrition related health

    Mol Nutr Food Res

    (2009)
  • N.G. Congdon et al.

    Important causes of visual impairment in the world today

    JAMA

    (2003)
  • C. Bunce et al.

    Causes of blind certifications in England and Wales: April 1999–March 2000

    Eye (Lond)

    (2008)
  • F. Bandello et al.

    Public health impact of neovascular age-related macular degeneration treatments extrapolated from visual acuity

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2007)
  • A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2001)
  • D. Albanes et al.

    Alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene supplements and lung cancer incidence in the alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene cancer prevention study: effects of base-line characteristics and study compliance

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1996)
  • G.S. Omenn et al.

    Effects of a combination of beta carotene and vitamin A on lung cancer and cardiovascular disease

    N Engl J Med

    (1996)
  • Cited by (0)

    This work was financially supported by the European Responsible Nutrition Alliance.

    View full text