Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 1064-1066 (October 2009)


View previous. 14 of 16 View next.

Effect of blood sampling schedule on the ability to discriminate between postprandial glycemic responses

Janice L. Lui, B.Sc.a, Xiaomiao Lan-Pidhainy, M.Sc.a, Yolanda Brummer, M.Sc.b, Susan M. Tosh, Ph.D.b, Peter J. Wood, Ph.D.b, Thomas M.S. Wolever, D.M.aCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 3 December 2008; accepted 20 April 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

The blood glucose responses elicited by foods are often determined using blood samples taken at 15-min intervals. Our objective was to see whether taking blood samples at 10-min intervals affected the results.

Methods

Overnight-fasted healthy subjects (n=11) were studied on nine different occasions with seven different test meals. Blood samples were obtained at fasting and at 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 45, 50, 60, 90, and 120min after starting to eat. Peak rise, incremental area under the curve, and relative glycemic response were calculated using the 10- and 15-min sampling schedules.

Results

With 10-min intervals, peak rise was 4% greater than with 15-min intervals (P<0.001), but sampling interval did not significantly affect mean incremental area under the curve or relative glycemic response. The 10-min blood sampling schedule had a slightly greater ability to discriminate between foods and between subjects for peak rise and relative glycemic response.

Conclusions

We conclude that the blood sampling schedule used may influence the accuracy and precision of measurements of glycemic response; however, the difference between taking blood samples at 10-min and 15-min intervals is quite small.

a Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

b Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Guelph Food Research Centre, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +416-978-5556; fax: +416-978-5882.

 This study was funded by the Advanced Foods and Materials Network.

PII: S0899-9007(09)00198-1

doi:10.1016/j.nut.2009.04.017


View previous. 14 of 16 View next.

Advertisement