Nutrition
Volume 21, Issue 9 , Pages 908-913, September 2005

Evaluation of an iron specific checklist for the assessment of dietary iron intake in pregnant and postpartum women

Part of the study was presented at the Third Annual Congress of the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand; Melbourne, Australia; 1999.

  • Shao J. Zhou, M.N.D.

      Affiliations

    • Child Nutrition Research Centre, Child Health Research Institute and Department of Paediatrics, University of Adelaide, Women’s & Children’s Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • ,
  • Michelle J. Schilling, M.N.D.

      Affiliations

    • Maternal Perinatal Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Women’s & Children’s Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
    • Nutrition Unit, Department of Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
  • ,
  • Maria Makrides, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Child Nutrition Research Centre, Child Health Research Institute and Department of Paediatrics, University of Adelaide, Women’s & Children’s Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
    • Maternal Perinatal Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Women’s & Children’s Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +618-8161-6067; fax: +618-8161-7481.

Received 30 September 2004; accepted 20 November 2004. published online 25 July 2005.

Abstract 

Objective

This study developed and validated an iron checklist for assessing dietary iron intake of pregnant and postpartum women.

Methods

The checklist included 65 food and drink items. Iron intake measured by the checklist was compared with a diet history interview by paired t test and by the Bland-Altman method in 54 pregnant women. We then used the checklist to prospectively assess iron intake in a separate group of women in late pregnancy (n = 179) and at 6 mo postpartum (n = 177). The ability of the checklist to predict iron status was evaluated.

Results

There was no difference in reported mean iron intakes between the checklist and the diet history and there were good correlations between iron intake estimated from both methods (r = 0.69, P < 0.001 for food alone, r = 0.99, P < 0.001 for food plus supplements). However, the agreement between the two methods at an individual level was low. Pregnant women with low iron intake (lower than the recommended dietary intake) had lower serum ferritin levels (9.7 versus 14.5 μg/L, P < 0.001) and higher risk of iron deficiency (67.5% versus 34.9%, P < 0.0001) compared with women with adequate iron intake (at least the minimum recommended dietary intake), but these differences disappeared when women taking iron supplements were excluded. There was no association between iron intake and serum ferritin at 6 mo postpartum or between iron intake and hemoglobin levels at the end of pregnancy or at 6 mo postpartum.

Conclusion

This simple iron checklist is a useful tool in describing iron intake of population samples of pregnant women but has limited ability to predict iron status.

Keywords:  Iron checklist , Iron intake , Iron status , Pregnant women , Recommended dietary intake

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Salary support for Maria Makrides was from a NHMRC Applied Health Sciences Fellowship and a NHMRC RD Wright Fellowship.

PII: S0899-9007(05)00168-1

doi:10.1016/j.nut.2004.11.020

Nutrition
Volume 21, Issue 9 , Pages 908-913, September 2005