Nutrition
Volume 17, Issue 4 , Pages 287-291, April 2001

Total-body-water measurement with 18O-labeled water in short-bowel patients with an ileostomy

  • C. Chambrier, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Unité de Nutrition Artificielle, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Cécile Chambrier, MD, PhD, Unité de Nutrition Artificielle, Département d’Anesthesie-Réanimation, Hôpital E. Herriot, Place d’Arsonval, 69437 Lyon Cedex 03, France.
  • ,
  • S. Normand, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine de Lyon, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France
  • ,
  • R. Ecochard, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Département d’information biomédicales, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
  • ,
  • C. Pachiaudi

      Affiliations

    • Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine de Lyon, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France
  • ,
  • M. Laville, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine de Lyon, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France
  • ,
  • P. Boulátreau, MD

      Affiliations

    • Unité de Nutrition Artificielle, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France

Accepted 15 September 2000.

Abstract 

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of H218O for total-body-water (TBW) determination in patients with short bowel because ileostomy losses of labeled water can falsify TBW. Thirteen adult short-bowel patients were studied after an overnight fast. Saliva, blood, urine and ileostomy output were collected before and 30, 60, 90, 120, 240, and 360 min after oral ingestion of 0.88 g/kg of 2.5% H218O to measure 18O abundance by isotope-ratio mass spectrometry. TBW was calculated from the dilution of the isotopic water in saliva and plasma. The quantity of labeled water lost in the ileostomy was calculated from the isotopic enrichment of the ileostomy output from T0 to T360. The values obtained from saliva or plasma with (corrected) and without (uncorrected) considering H218O lost in the ileostomy output were compared with a paired t test. Agreement was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method. From T0 to T360, the ileostomy output and the percentage of lost labeled water were 490 ± 314 mL and 6.38 ± 8.52%, respectively. TBW calculated from plasma or saliva isotopic enrichment was different, and a significant difference was also observed between corrected and uncorrected TBW values (saliva: uncorrected TBW = 32.35 ± 7.52 L, corrected TBW = 30.29 ± 6.09 L; plasma; uncorrected TBW = 30.80 ± 7.29 L, corrected TBW = 28.79 ± 5.79 L). The agreement between the values obtained from the two dilution spaces or between the two calculation methods was poor. Because of the large discrepancies between calculation methods, determination of TBW from oral ingestion of 18O-labeled water in patients with short bowel should be calculated only from plasma 18O space dilution and should consider ileostomy losses.

Keywords:  short bowel, ileostomy, total body water, 18O-labeled water, plasma, saliva

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by a grant from the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique 1996.

PII: S0899-9007(00)00506-2

Nutrition
Volume 17, Issue 4 , Pages 287-291, April 2001